Kavanau v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 19 Cal. App. 4th 730 (1993)

Citation: Kavanau v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 19 Cal. App. 4th 730 (1993)
Parent Document: Kavanau v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 19 Cal. App. 4th 730 (1993)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 1993-10-21
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2270028/kavanau-v-santa-monica-rent-con... ↗

Full Text

806 chars

Under Regulation 4107(a), regardless of the amount of rent needed to satisfy the MNOI formula, and notwithstanding any other provision of the regulations, “[n]o upward rent adjustment may be authorized for any 12 month period in an amount in excess of twelve percent (12%) or twice the Employment Cost Index (ECI), whichever is greater.” (We refer to this as a 12 percent cap.) If the amount of any adjustment otherwise authorized by the MNOI formula exceeds 12 percent, “the full justified amount shall be granted over a period of years such that the rent does not increase by greater than the said limit in any given year.” Simply put, under Regulation 4107(a), rents can never be increased more than 12 percent (or twice the ECI) in any year, notwithstanding the amount of entitlement under the MNOI. B.

Other Sections in This Document (48)

Full Text