Kavanau v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 19 Cal. App. 4th 730 (1993)

Citation: Kavanau v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 19 Cal. App. 4th 730 (1993)
Parent Document: Kavanau v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 19 Cal. App. 4th 730 (1993)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 1993-10-21
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2270028/kavanau-v-santa-monica-rent-con... ↗

Full Text

550 chars

The Board’s interpretation of Regulation 4107(f) makes it unnecessary for us to determine whether any evidence Kavanau might have presented on his appeal to the Board could or should reasonably have been considered in deciding whether to waive the 12 percent cap. His building was not damaged by an earthquake. He just wanted to show that he would not be receiving a fair return on his investment if the amount the Board determined to be a fair return was reduced as required by the 12 percent cap. (See Fox v. San Francisco Residential Rent etc. Bd.

Other Sections in This Document (48)

Full Text