DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Kavanau v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 16 Cal. 4th 761 (1997)

Citation
Kavanau v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 16 Cal. 4th 761 (1997) 7.
Parent Document
Kavanau v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 16 Cal. 4th 761 (1997)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
1997-08-26
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5607899/kavanau-v-santa-monica-rent-con... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (115)

Full Text

464 chars 
7. Unlike Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, supra, _ U.S. _ [117 S.Ct. 1659], and Penn Central, supra, 438 U.S. 104, which involved use retrictions, here the value of offsetting benefits such as the possibility that future increased rents permitted by the Board will offset some of plaintiff’s losses is relevant only to whether just compensation has been paid. The existence of that possibility does not negate the fact that a taking has already occurred.