Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Section 1803

Citation
Section 1803
Parent Document
1041 20TH St., LLC v. Santa Monica Rent Control Bd., 250 Cal. Rptr. 3d 376 (2019)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2019-07-30

Full Text

1,092 chars
To the extent 20th Street Owner argues that the Board may not reconsider its prior conclusion that removal permits exempt units from rent *45control, the doctrine of administrative finality does not apply when an agency acts beyond its authority: "Implicit in the cases denying a board's power to review or reexamine a question, however, is the qualification that the board must have acted within its jurisdiction and within the powers conferred on it. Where a board's order is not based upon a determination of fact, but upon an erroneous conclusion of law, and is without the board's authority, the order is clearly void ...." ( Aylward v. State Board etc. Examiners (1948) 31 Cal.2d 833, 839, 192 P.2d 929 ; Helene Curtis, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Assessment Appeals Bds. (2004) 121 Cal.App.4th 29, 39-40, 16 Cal.Rptr.3d 658.) Accordingly, the doctrine that an administrative agency cannot reconsider a final administrative decision does not operate here to require the Board to exempt the 20th Street property's rental units or Unit 211 of the Ocean Avenue property from rent control.16