Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Section 1803

Citation
Section 1803
Parent Document
1041 20TH St., LLC v. Santa Monica Rent Control Bd., 250 Cal. Rptr. 3d 376 (2019)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2019-07-30

Full Text

888 chars
20th Street Owner contends that the Board is bound by its prior 1993 decision, regardless of whether it was contrary to the Rent Control Law. 20th Street Owner cites Olive Proration etc. Com. v. Agri. etc. Com. (1941) 17 Cal.2d 204, 109 P.2d 918 ( Olive Proration ) in support of its contention. The court in Olive Proration *389held: "[T]he question whether the administrative agency may reverse a particular determination depends upon the kind of power exercised in making the order and the terms of the statute under which the power was exercised. As to the first factor, almost without exception, courts have held that the determination of an administrative agency as to the existence of a fact or status which is based upon a present or past group of facts, may not thereafter be altered or modified." ( Id. at p. 209, 109 P.2d 918.) Olive Proration does not support affirmance here.