Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Citation
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Parent Document
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 1952-02-08
Other Sections in This Document (69)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
- Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
Full Text
1,062 charsIt appears that, from 1936 to the commencement of the action, the number of members of the board of directors of Douglas varied from 13 to 17. The amended complaint shows that 11 persons who were officers, directors or executives of Douglas and three other persons (not officers of Douglas) promoted and organized Garrett in 1936. Six of those organizers were, at times during said period from 1936 to commencement of the action, directors of Douglas, and during said period no more than five of said organizers of Garrett were directors of Douglas at any one time. Four of said organizers were directors of Douglas from 1940 to June, 1943. Three of them were such directors from June, 1943, to 1946. Two of them were such directors after 1946. None of the directors of Douglas, other than those who were organizers of Garrett, owned stock or held any position in Garrett. It thus appears that the directors of Douglas who owned stock in Garrett and who allegedly profited from the alleged wrongs did not at any time constitute a majority of the board of di *174