Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)

Citation
Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
Parent Document
Findley v. Garrett, 109 Cal. App. 2d 166 (1952)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
1952-02-08

Other Sections in This Document (69)

Full Text

955 chars
of Garrett from 1936 to 1948; defendant Raymond was a vice-president and director of Douglas from 1936 to date, and he was a director of Garrett in 1939 and 1940; defendant Northrop wa§ a director of Douglas in 1936 and 1937, and he was treasurer of Garrett in 1939 and 1940; that Mr. Wetzel (not a defendant) was senior vice-president, general manager, and director of Douglas from 1936 to 1938, and he was director of Garrett from 1936 to 1938; defendant Garrett was the purchasing agent of Northrop Corporation (subsidiary of Douglas) in 1936, and he was president of Garrett from 1936 to date; Mr. Cover (not a defendant) was executive vice-president and director of Douglas from 1936 to 1943 but was not a director of Garrett; defendant Conant was a director of Douglas from 1940 to date but was not a director of Garrett; defendant Bertrandias was vice-president of Douglas in 1939 and 1940 and from 1945 to date, but was not a director of Garrett.)