Little v. Sanchez, 166 Cal. App. 3d 501 (1985)
- Citation
- Little v. Sanchez, 166 Cal. App. 3d 501 (1985)
- Parent Document
- Little v. Sanchez, 166 Cal. App. 3d 501 (1985)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 1985-03-15
Other Sections in This Document (18)
- Little v. Sanchez, 166 Cal. App. 3d 501 (1985)
- Little v. Sanchez, 166 Cal. App. 3d 501 (1985)
- Little v. Sanchez, 166 Cal. App. 3d 501 (1985)
- Little v. Sanchez, 166 Cal. App. 3d 501 (1985)
- Little v. Sanchez, 166 Cal. App. 3d 501 (1985)
- Little v. Sanchez, 166 Cal. App. 3d 501 (1985)
- Little v. Sanchez, 166 Cal. App. 3d 501 (1985)
- Little v. Sanchez, 166 Cal. App. 3d 501 (1985)
- Little v. Sanchez, 166 Cal. App. 3d 501 (1985)
- Little v. Sanchez, 166 Cal. App. 3d 501 (1985)
- Little v. Sanchez, 166 Cal. App. 3d 501 (1985)
- Little v. Sanchez, 166 Cal. App. 3d 501 (1985)
- Little v. Sanchez, 166 Cal. App. 3d 501 (1985)
- Little v. Sanchez, 166 Cal. App. 3d 501 (1985)
- Little v. Sanchez, 166 Cal. App. 3d 501 (1985)
- Little v. Sanchez, 166 Cal. App. 3d 501 (1985)
- Little v. Sanchez, 166 Cal. App. 3d 501 (1985)
- Little v. Sanchez, 166 Cal. App. 3d 501 (1985)
Full Text
479 charsThese documents even provided that if any portion of the existing arrearages had not already been paid as contemplated, then the tenants’ future payments were to be applied to the monthly “installments” exacted to maintain the “stay” rather than to reduce the only actual indebtedness upon which the judgment could legally have been based. (See Cavanaugh v. Hugh (1960) 182 Cal.App.2d 714, 722-723 [6 Cal.Rptr. 525]; Pfitzer v. Candelas (1921) 53 Cal.App. 737, 741 [200 P. 839].)