Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Section 8

Citation
Section 8
Parent Document
Johnson v. Hous. Auth. of Oakland, 250 Cal. Rptr. 3d 686 (2019)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2019-07-16

Full Text

770 chars
The trial court entered judgment in Johnson's favor directing the housing authority to set aside its decision and reconsider whether to terminate Johnson from the section 8 program. The court found that the pre-termination notice was deficient because it did not provide any of the facts regarding the alleged lease violations and failed to identify what "additional information" Johnson failed to provide. The *693court also found that the decisions by the hearing officer and executive director were inadequate because they failed to identify the factual basis for their decisions or the reasons for the exercise of discretion regarding the non-mandatory grounds for termination.1 The housing authority timely filed a notice of appeal. Discussion 1. Standard of Review