Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Rich v. Schwab, 75 Cal. Rptr. 2d 170 (1998)

Citation
Rich v. Schwab, 75 Cal. Rptr. 2d 170 (1998)
Parent Document
Rich v. Schwab, 75 Cal. Rptr. 2d 170 (1998)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
1998-06-01

Other Sections in This Document (60)

Full Text

861 chars
Our conclusion as to the supplementary nature of the rights created by the MHRL is of course consistent with those cases which have upheld the validity of local mobilehome rent control ordinances against claims that they were preempted by the MHRL. (See King v. Mobile Home Rent Review Bd. (1989) 216 Cal.App.3d 1532, 1538-1539 fn. 2, 265 Cal.Rptr. 624; Pahs Verdes Shores Mobile Estates, Ltd. v. City of Los Angeles (1983) 142 Cal.App.3d 362, 374, 190 Cal.Rptr. 866 (Palos Verdes).) As the court in Palos Verdes stated: "The Mobilehome Residency Law, while covering some aspects of the relationship between mobilehome residents *175 and mobilehome park owners, cannot reasonably be said to constitute a general and pervasive legislative scheme for the regulation of all aspects of mobilehome parks and residents." (142 Cal.App.3d at p. 374, 190 Cal.Rptr. 866.)