Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Morrison v. Vineyard Creek L.P., 193 Cal. App. 4th 1254 (2011)

Citation
Morrison v. Vineyard Creek L.P., 193 Cal. App. 4th 1254 (2011)
Parent Document
Morrison v. Vineyard Creek L.P., 193 Cal. App. 4th 1254 (2011)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2011-03-29

Other Sections in This Document (83)

Full Text

645 chars
Third, Vineyard Creek did not discriminate against Morrison based on the type of business she wanted to run out of her apartment, because Vineyard Creek’s prohibition was against all nonresidential uses, not just family daycare homes. Nor is there any evidence whatsoever that Vineyard Creek *1273put the residential use provision in its lease as a ploy to keep people from opening family daycare homes in particular. As the trial court found, no matter what kind of nonresidential use Morrison had sought for her apartment, and whether that nonresidential use was for the purpose of generating income or not, Vineyard Creek would have objected.