Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Morrison v. Vineyard Creek L.P., 193 Cal. App. 4th 1254 (2011)

Citation
Morrison v. Vineyard Creek L.P., 193 Cal. App. 4th 1254 (2011)
Parent Document
Morrison v. Vineyard Creek L.P., 193 Cal. App. 4th 1254 (2011)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2011-03-29

Other Sections in This Document (83)

Full Text

617 chars
First, Vineyard Creek’s objection to Morrison running a family daycare home was not based on the source of her income, but on the fact that her lease expressly limited her use of the apartment to private residential purposes. Similarly, Morrison’s lease with Vineyard Creek did not preclude any particular source of income, but all nonresidential use of the apartment. Vineyard Creek cared about how she was going to use the apartment, not where she got the money to pay her rent. In fact, the trial court found, if Morrison had stated she wanted to open a free daycare home, Vineyard Creek still would have objected.