Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Morrison v. Vineyard Creek L.P., 193 Cal. App. 4th 1254 (2011)

Citation
Morrison v. Vineyard Creek L.P., 193 Cal. App. 4th 1254 (2011)
Parent Document
Morrison v. Vineyard Creek L.P., 193 Cal. App. 4th 1254 (2011)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2011-03-29

Other Sections in This Document (83)

Full Text

625 chars
Morrison prevailed in the lawsuit, in the sense that she obtained some of the relief she sought: Vineyard Creek agreed to allow her to remain in her apartment and to operate her family daycare home, and it also agreed to pay the damages Morrison allegedly incurred as a result of Vineyard Creek’s delay in acknowledging her right to do so. The question, however, is whether Morrison was the prevailing party on claims for which she sought and could recover attorney fees: namely, her claims for violation of the antiretaliation statute and FEHA. (Graciano v. Robinson Ford Sales, Inc., supra, 144 Cal.App.4th at pp. 151-152.)