§ 1085
- Citation
- § 1085
- Parent Document
- Cardenas v. Noren, 235 Cal. App. 3d 1344 (1991)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 1991-11-08
Other Sections in This Document (34)
- Cardenas v. Noren, 235 Cal. App. 3d 1344 (1991)
- Cardenas v. Noren, 235 Cal. App. 3d 1344 (1991)
- § 1085
- § 1085
- § 1085
- § 1085
- § 1085
- § 1085
- § 1085
- § 1085
- § 1085
- § 1085
- § 1085
- § 1085
- § 1085
- § 1085
- § 1085
- § 1085
- § 1085
- § 1085
- § 1085
- § 1085
- § 1085
- § 1085
- § 1085
- § 1085
- § 1085
- § 1085
- § 1085
- § 1085
- § 1085
- § 1085
- § 1085
- § 1085
Full Text
428 chars§ 1085.) Appellant claims a writ should have issued to the sheriff ordering him to restore appellant to possession of certain real property because the sheriff wrongfully evicted him. Appellant contends his eviction was unlawful because although he was a tenant and a named defendant in an unlawful detainer action, he was never served with process or named in the default judgment. For the reasons stated below we affirm. Facts