Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)

Citation
Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
Parent Document
Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
1980-07-24

Other Sections in This Document (69)

Full Text

699 chars
Thus, the lease does not even identify the payment as an advance payment of rent, much less indicate that its primary purpose was to secure lessees’ performance. The total agreed rent was $90,000, and we are aware of no authority prohibiting parties to a commercial lease from agreeing that more of the rent shall be paid and, presumably, earned in the fore part of the lease term than the latter. Being made payable upon execution of the lease, which occurred prior to the first day of the second lease term, it is likely that the primary purpose of the payment of $4,500 was to secure execution of the lease by lessors. *566 Disposition Affirmed. Tamura, Acting P. J., and McDaniel, J., concurred.