Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Citation
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Parent Document
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 1980-07-24
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2115139/schulman-v-vera/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (69)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
Full Text
539 charsdetermined that the lessor’s breach of the implied warranty was relevant to the issue of the tenant’s obligation to pay rent and, thus, the right to possession of the premises. The court then concluded that the lessor’s breach of the warranty could be litigated in defense of the lessor’s unlawful detainer action. Lessees urge that by parity of reasoning, lessors’ alleged breach of their covenant to repair the roof should be Iitigable in this unlawful detainer proceeding. Lessors contend that the express language of the court in Green