Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Citation
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Parent Document
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 1980-07-24
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2115139/schulman-v-vera/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (69)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
- Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
Full Text
950 charsIn their answer lessees set forth an affirmative defense which in essence alleged that lessors had breached their covenant to repair the roof of the building causing lessees damages in excess of $10,000. Specifically, lessees claimed that throughout the spring of 1978 the roof leaked water, forcing lessees to operate their restaurant with buckets on the tables to catch the leaking water and with two inches of standing water on one portion of the floor of the restaurant. When the matter came on for trial, prior to the presentation of evidence, counsel for lessors moved, in effect, to strike the affirmative defense and to preclude the presentation of evidence with respect to it. Following argument, the' court granted the motion, observing that lessees might file an action for damages for lessors’ alleged breach of covenant, but that this claim could not appropriately be asserted as a defense and litigated in this unlawful detainer action.