Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)

Citation
Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
Parent Document
Schulman v. Vera, 108 Cal. App. 3d 552 (1980)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
1980-07-24

Other Sections in This Document (69)

Full Text

640 chars
(1976) 55 Cal.App.3d 131, 139-141 [126 Cal.Rptr. 690].) The one thing the lessee could not do was to remain in possession of the premises without paying rent, await the lessor’s filing of an unlawful detainer action and then set up the claim of damages for the lessor’s breach of covenant as a defense to the unlawful detainer. (Arnold v. Krigbaum (1915) 169 Cal. 143, 145-146 [146 P. 423]; cf. Veysey v. Moriyama (1921) 184 Cal. 802, 805-806 [195 P. 662, 20 A.L.R. 1363]; Petroleum Collections Inc. v. Swords (1975) 48 Cal.App.3d 841, 847 [122 Cal.Rptr. 114].) Perhaps the leading California case on the point is Arnold v. Krigbaum, supra,