de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)

Citation: de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
Parent Document: de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2011-03-29
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5810133/de-la-cuesta-v-benham/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (49)

de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)

Full Text

458 chars

In contrast with Nasser, Kytasty, Hilltop and Jackson, there is the remarkable case of Ajaxo Inc. v. E*Trade Group Inc. (2005) 135 Cal.App.4th 21 [37 Cal.Rptr.3d 221] (Ajaxo)—remarkable because it really cannot be reconciled with the trial court’s order in this case unless one were to throw up one’s hands and say that anything less than a complete victory gives the trial court carte blanche to determine section 1717 prevailing party status as it pleases.