Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)

Citation
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
Parent Document
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2011-03-29

Other Sections in This Document (49)

Full Text

589 chars
The tenant quickly answered the unlawful detainer complaint, asserting that she owed nothing: The landlord had breached the warranty of habitability, and refused to repair certain water and sewage leaks. Thus the answer asserted (without further specification) that “The rental value is currently zero *1291due to the health issues,” and went on to claim that the “lease be ordered forfeit” and the landlord declared “unable to sue thereon” because of “fraud in the inducement.” (In a trial brief the tenant would assert that the premises “leaked both rain and sewage water like a sieve.”)