de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)

Citation: de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
Parent Document: de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2011-03-29
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5810133/de-la-cuesta-v-benham/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (49)

de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)

Full Text

331 chars

On the split decision (no entitlement) end, the court’s phrases were: “so equivocal” (Hsu, supra, 9 Cal.4th at p. 874), “mixed result” (id. at p. 875), “opposing litigants could each legitimately claim some success in the litigation” (ibid.), and “ ‘ostensibly prevailing party receives only a part of the relief sought’ ” (ibid.).