de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- Citation
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- Parent Document
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 2011-03-29
Other Sections in This Document (49)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
- de la Cuesta v. Benham, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1287 (2011)
Full Text
607 charsOf greatest significance here is the relative extent of the success of each party in comparison to its basic litigation position: The tenant, Benham, asserted the extreme position that she owed nothing by way of back rent because of the water and sewage leaks; she ended up with a judgment of about $70,000 against her. By contrast, at his most exuberant (and that in an amended trial brief), the landlord, de la Cuesta, asserted he was owed $103,000 but that was cut back to $70,000. The landlord, in short, got about 70 percent of the most of what he sought going into trial; the tenant got zero percent.5