Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)

Citation: Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Parent Document: Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2017-10-05
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/6239155/fernandes-v-singh/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (61)

Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)

Full Text

374 chars

Fourth, Singh contends the attorney fee award was excessive. The trial court was best positioned to determine a reasonable fee award. (See PLCM Group, Inc. v. Drexler (2000) 22 Cal.4th 1084, 1095, 95 Cal.Rptr.2d 198, 997 P.2d 511.) Because Singh does not fairly describe the evidence supporting the award, he has not demonstrated an abuse of discretion. *761*945DISPOSITION9