Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)

Citation
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Parent Document
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2017-10-05

Other Sections in This Document (61)

Full Text

618 chars
The return of a registered process server "establishes a presumption, affecting the burden of producing evidence , of the facts stated in the return." ( Evid. Code, § 647, italics added.) Rawat claims she produced evidence sufficient to rebut the presumption, so it should have disappeared. (Id ., § 604; see Farr v. County of Nevada (2010) 187 Cal.App.4th 669, 680-682, 114 Cal.Rptr.3d 36 ; In re Heather B. (1992) 9 Cal.App.4th 535, 560-561, 11 Cal.Rptr.2d 891.) But the trial court found Rawat appeared in the action, disbelieving her contrary declarations, thereby trumping any issue about the service presumption.