Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)

Citation
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Parent Document
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2017-10-05

Other Sections in This Document (61)

Full Text

358 chars
On appeal, Rawat claims error in the trial court's denial of her motion to vacate the judgment based on lack of service, and attacks the punitive damage award. Singh also challenges the punitive damage award, disputes *935service on Rawat, and contends the attorney fee award was excessive. Finding no merit in defendants' claims, we shall affirm. BACKGROUND