Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)

Citation
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Parent Document
Fernandes v. Singh, 224 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751 (2017)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2017-10-05

Other Sections in This Document (61)

Full Text

338 chars
Rawat attacks the denial of her motion to vacate the judgment, contending the judgment was void for lack of service and extrinsic fraud. She also attacks the punitive damage award, both for lack of evidence of reprehensible conduct and lack of evidence of financial condition. We shall reject each of these claims. A. The Motion to Vacate