Section 1941

Citation: Section 1941
Parent Document: Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 1981-02-13
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1241155/knight-v-hallsthammar/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (192)

Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941

Full Text

342 chars

However, it is clear that a tenant aware of the apartment's defects at the time of rental, and aware the landlord has not expressly agreed to repair or improve, may not thereafter withhold rent while defending an unlawful detainer action on the basis of known defects. (Quevedo v. Braga (1977) 72 Cal. App.3d Supp. 1, 7 [140 Cal. Rptr. 143].)