Section 1941

Citation: Section 1941
Parent Document: Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 1981-02-13
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1241155/knight-v-hallsthammar/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (192)

Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Knight v. Hallsthammar, 623 P.2d 268 (1981)
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1942
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941
Section 1941

Full Text

290 chars

The trial court’s erroneous instructions to the jury and failure to set forth properly the standards of habitability were likely to mislead the jury, and therefore the judgment is reversed. (See Henderson v. *60Harnischfeger Corp. (1974) 12 Cal.3d 663, 670 [117 Cal.Rptr. 1, 527 P.2d 353].)