Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

§ 3

Citation
§ 3
Parent Document
Muro v. Superior Court, 184 Cal. App. 3d 1089 (1986)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
1986-08-26

Other Sections in This Document (86)

Full Text

502 chars
court noted that the justification for establishing a doctrine of strict liability in tort was not a concern that warranty law failed to adequately define the manufacturer’s duty but that the intricacies of the law of sales applicable to commercial transactions might defeat the obvious representation of safety for intended use by the manufacturer. (38 Cal.3d at p. 459.) The doctrine of strict liability evolved from the problems that sometimes accompany the implied warranty rationale. (See Comment,