Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Muro v. Superior Court, 184 Cal. App. 3d 1089 (1986)

Citation
Muro v. Superior Court, 184 Cal. App. 3d 1089 (1986)
Parent Document
Muro v. Superior Court, 184 Cal. App. 3d 1089 (1986)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
1986-08-26

Other Sections in This Document (86)

Full Text

480 chars
analyzed the two-fold evolution in California; Civil Code statutes (see, e.g., § 1941 et seq.) imposed obligations on lessors of dwellings to make them tenantable which, as a matter of public policy, could not be waived; and the judicial decisions recognized that “a lease for a dwelling contains an implied warranty of habitability” (38 Cal.3d at p. 462). Particular emphasis was placed on the implied warranty of habitability and the rationale of Green v. Superior Court, supra,