Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Muro v. Superior Court, 184 Cal. App. 3d 1089 (1986)

Citation
Muro v. Superior Court, 184 Cal. App. 3d 1089 (1986)
Parent Document
Muro v. Superior Court, 184 Cal. App. 3d 1089 (1986)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
1986-08-26

Other Sections in This Document (86)

Full Text

266 chars
Preliminarily we reject petitioner’s procedural contention that Anjac should have been precluded from demurring to petitioner’s amended complaint because, in granting the motion for leave to amend over Anjac’s objections, a superior court judge had ruled that Becker