Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Muro v. Superior Court, 184 Cal. App. 3d 1089 (1986)

Citation
Muro v. Superior Court, 184 Cal. App. 3d 1089 (1986)
Parent Document
Muro v. Superior Court, 184 Cal. App. 3d 1089 (1986)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
1986-08-26

Other Sections in This Document (86)

Full Text

224 chars
120 Cal.App.3d at p. 111), there is no scarcity of commercial property. Also, unlike residential tenants, but like landlords, commercial tenants can absorb the costs as a business expense. In summary, we conclude that Becker