Greenburger v. Leary, 119 Misc. 2d 358 (1983)
- Citation
- Greenburger v. Leary, 119 Misc. 2d 358 (1983)
- Parent Document
- Greenburger v. Leary, 119 Misc. 2d 358 (1983)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 1983-05-23
Other Sections in This Document (14)
- Greenburger v. Leary, 119 Misc. 2d 358 (1983)
- Greenburger v. Leary, 119 Misc. 2d 358 (1983)
- Greenburger v. Leary, 119 Misc. 2d 358 (1983)
- Greenburger v. Leary, 119 Misc. 2d 358 (1983)
- Greenburger v. Leary, 119 Misc. 2d 358 (1983)
- Greenburger v. Leary, 119 Misc. 2d 358 (1983)
- Greenburger v. Leary, 119 Misc. 2d 358 (1983)
- Greenburger v. Leary, 119 Misc. 2d 358 (1983)
- Greenburger v. Leary, 119 Misc. 2d 358 (1983)
- Greenburger v. Leary, 119 Misc. 2d 358 (1983)
- Greenburger v. Leary, 119 Misc. 2d 358 (1983)
- Greenburger v. Leary, 119 Misc. 2d 358 (1983)
- Greenburger v. Leary, 119 Misc. 2d 358 (1983)
- Greenburger v. Leary, 119 Misc. 2d 358 (1983)
Full Text
600 charsRespondent also claims that he is entitled to a rent abatement for a lack of services and breach of warranty of habitability. I find that the credible evidence offered at the trial did not establish any abatable conditions in the respondent’s apartment. Similarly I find no proof that the respondent had given petitioner sufficient notice of his intention to repair the front door himself so as to invoke *363the “repair and deduct” line of authority. There was no credible proof of the landlord’s willful refusal to make the repairs. (Cf. Katurah Corp. v Wells, 115 Misc 2d 16 [App Term, 1st Dept].)