Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

1212 Grand Concourse LLC v. Ynguil, 27 Misc. 3d 205 (2010)

Citation
1212 Grand Concourse LLC v. Ynguil, 27 Misc. 3d 205 (2010)
Parent Document
1212 Grand Concourse LLC v. Ynguil, 27 Misc. 3d 205 (2010)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
2010-01-08

Other Sections in This Document (40)

Full Text

488 chars
*215The petitioners in these cases may not employ RPAPL 711 (1) as a means of evading the strictures of the Rent Stabilization Code, for. whatever purpose they may have — whether it be to rid themselves of Section 8 tenancies where they are otherwise proscribed from doing so, or to achieve greater rent increases through increased tenant turnover. Nor may the petitioners evade the strictures and requirements of 42 USC § 1437f, the Williams Second Consent Judgment, or the HAP contract.