1212 Grand Concourse LLC v. Ynguil, 27 Misc. 3d 205 (2010)

Citation: 1212 Grand Concourse LLC v. Ynguil, 27 Misc. 3d 205 (2010)
Parent Document: 1212 Grand Concourse LLC v. Ynguil, 27 Misc. 3d 205 (2010)
Jurisdiction: New York (state)
Effective Date: 2010-01-08
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/6311119/1212-grand-concourse-llc-v-ynguil/ ↗

Full Text

935 chars

In these proceedings the grounds for the evictions “arose while the lease and contract were in effect” and “relate to the Section 8” tenancies. {Williams Second Consent Judgment HH 3-4.) This is because the NYCHA termination of the contracts and leases was a direct response to the petitioners’ breaches of the HAP contract; if the petitioners had not refused to maintain HQS, as their contracts required, then the NYCHA would have been without a basis to terminate the contracts and the leases. The terminations of both the HAP contract and the leases trace directly back to the landlords’ willful violations of the contracts; *213the landlords’ actions were ultimately the cause of the terminations. Viewed in this light, ultimately it was the petitioners who terminated the leases. Under federal statute, the Williams Second Consent Judgment, and the HAP contract, such attempts to evict the tenants without good cause cannot stand.

Other Sections in This Document (40)

Full Text