Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

1212 Grand Concourse LLC v. Ynguil, 27 Misc. 3d 205 (2010)

Citation
1212 Grand Concourse LLC v. Ynguil, 27 Misc. 3d 205 (2010)
Parent Document
1212 Grand Concourse LLC v. Ynguil, 27 Misc. 3d 205 (2010)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
2010-01-08

Other Sections in This Document (40)

Full Text

724 chars
The underlying facts are not in dispute.1 In each case the respondent tenants had been beneficiaries of Section 8 housing assistance payments (HAP), which were payments of a portion of their rents made by the NYCHA to their landlords. In due course their apartments all failed federally-mandated housing *207quality standards (HQS) inspections. Thereafter, despite warnings from the NYCHA, the petitioner landlords have not as yet fulfilled their legal and contractual obligations to rectify the offending conditions. Nor have the petitioners offered any defenses or explanations, rational or otherwise, for their concerted failures to perform their duties as landlords; rather, they say that such information is immaterial.