3515 Eastchester Rd., LLC v. Soto, 2025 NY Slip Op 25209 (2025)

Citation: 3515 Eastchester Rd., LLC v. Soto, 2025 NY Slip Op 25209 (2025)
Parent Document: 3515 Eastchester Rd., LLC v. Soto, 2025 NY Slip Op 25209 (2025)
Jurisdiction: New York (state)
Effective Date: 2025-09-16
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10675509/3515-eastchester-rd-llc-v-soto/ ↗

Full Text

672 chars

Petitioner in its moving papers conflates the proposed amendment to the Petition at ¶ 10 with its additional proposed amendment to the RPL § 231-c Notice. Petitioner's attorney asserts that the proposed amendment "merely goes to correct the inadvertent checkmark mistakenly [*4]reflecting Petitioner as exempt" from the GCEL, Affirm of Petitioner's Attorney at ¶ 15. See also Affirm of Petitioner's Agent at ¶¶ 4 and 5 ("this was a mere typographical error"). However, in these statements Petitioner minimizes what it is asking the court to permit, and fails to highlight all the ways in which its proposed revised RPL § 231-c Notice differs from the original, as follows:

Other Sections in This Document (50)

Full Text