Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

3515 Eastchester Rd., LLC v. Soto, 2025 NY Slip Op 25209 (2025)

Citation
3515 Eastchester Rd., LLC v. Soto, 2025 NY Slip Op 25209 (2025)
Parent Document
3515 Eastchester Rd., LLC v. Soto, 2025 NY Slip Op 25209 (2025)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
2025-09-16

Other Sections in This Document (50)

Full Text

1,048 chars
Measured against this test, for example, a predicate notice in a holdover proceeding based on breach of lease will be found insufficient where, "it failed to set forth case-specific allegations tending to support landlord's breach of lease claim with sufficient detail to have allowed tenant to prepare a defense". Prospero Hall LP v Paulino (85 Misc 3d 126[A], 224 NYS3d 787 [App Term 1st Dep't 2025]), citing City of New York v Valera, supra. See also, e.g., 49 W 12 Tenants Corp v Seidenberg (6 AD3d 243, 244, 774 NYS2d 339, 340 [1st Dep't [*6]2004])(affirming lower court's dismissal of action to evict tenant shareholder in a residential cooperative building where letter notification of intention to terminate proprietary lease found to be defective); 50 W 112th St HDFC v Ali (2006 NYLJ LEXIS 1567 [Civ Ct NY Co 2006])(dismissing holdover proceeding "without prejudice to a new proceeding based on a notice of termination stating a good cause for respondent's eviction that satisfies the due process protection of the Fourteenth Amendment").