3515 Eastchester Rd., LLC v. Soto, 2025 NY Slip Op 25209 (2025)

Citation: 3515 Eastchester Rd., LLC v. Soto, 2025 NY Slip Op 25209 (2025)
Parent Document: 3515 Eastchester Rd., LLC v. Soto, 2025 NY Slip Op 25209 (2025)
Jurisdiction: New York (state)
Effective Date: 2025-09-16
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10675509/3515-eastchester-rd-llc-v-soto/ ↗

Full Text

918 chars

Petitioner asserts that the proposed amendment is not prejudicial to Respondent and "merely goes to correct the inadvertent checkmark mistakenly reflecting Petitioner as exempt" from the GCEL, Affirm of Petitioner's Attorney at ¶ 15, and it seeks to correct this to reflect that the premises are subject to the GCEL and "to clarify that Petitioner is not renewing the lease because the tenant has engaged in a nuisance and Petitioner has a basis to maintain this proceeding under RPL § 216(1)", id. at ¶ 16. Petitioner argues that "voluminous case law" interpreting the application of the GCEL supports its request for leave to amend, citing to Doc Realty Mgmt Inc v Morales (85 Misc 3d 389, 227 NYS3d 843 [Civ Ct Qns Co 2024]); Emerald Green Phase II LP v Rivera (86 Misc 3d 1211[A], 232 NYS3d 919 [Civ Ct Kings Co 2025]); and 1372 Shakespeare Ave HDFC v Perez (LT-323487-24/BX, NYSCEF Doc #16 [Civ Ct Bx Co 4/7/25]).

Other Sections in This Document (50)

Full Text