Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)

Citation
315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
Parent Document
315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
2005-08-15

Other Sections in This Document (34)

Full Text

685 chars
“A cooperative or condominium is by nature a myriad of often competing views regarding personal living space, and decisions taken to benefit the collective interest may be unpalatable to one resident or another, creating the prospect that board decisions will be subjected to undue court involvement and judicial second-guessing. Allowing an owner who is simply dissatisfied with a particular board action a second opportunity to reopen the matter completely before a court, which—generally without knowing the property—may or may not agree with the reasonableness of the board’s determination, threatens the stability of the common living arrangement.” (Levandusky, supra at 539-540.)