Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)

Citation
315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
Parent Document
315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
2005-08-15

Other Sections in This Document (34)

Full Text

414 chars
Where, as here, the conditions within the respondents’ apartments are a direct result of a building-wide renovation project that the board of directors voted on and approved, it does not fall within the purview of a breach of the warranty of habitability, especially, where said renovations will inure to the benefit of the respondent shareholders by protecting their investments in a properly maintained building.