Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)

Citation
315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
Parent Document
315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
2005-08-15

Other Sections in This Document (34)

Full Text

357 chars
The Court’s holding in Levandusky regarding the business judgment rule was further reiterated and reinforced in its deci*647sion 40 W. 67th St. v Pullman (100 NY2d 147, 153 [2003]), stating that “the business judgment rule ‘best balances the individual and collective interests at stake’ in the residential cooperative setting (Levandusky, 75 NY2d at 537).”