315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- Citation
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- Parent Document
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 2005-08-15
Other Sections in This Document (34)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
- 315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell, 9 Misc. 3d 644 (2005)
Full Text
868 charsRespondents’ position, which the petitioner acknowledges, that the board and the contracting company did not provide appropriate alternative facilities, i.e., sufficient and accessible kitchens and bathrooms, resulting in major inconvenience and disruption in the lives of the respondents and other tenants during the renovation period, does not require a finding by this court that an abatement is warranted. Regardless of the fact that the petitioner’s attempts to alleviate any disruption of the tenants’ use of their respective premises during the renovations was inadequate due to the locations and limited number of kitchens and bathrooms available, there has been no proof forthcoming that these inadequacies were anything other than poor planning. The respondents have not demonstrated that the board’s conduct was willful or outside of its scope of authority.