Love v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 704 F.2d 100 (1983)

Citation: Love v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 704 F.2d 100 (1983)
Parent Document: Love v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 704 F.2d 100 (1983)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 1983-03-31
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8926891/love-v-united-states-department... ↗

Full Text

614 chars

Moreover, the procedure mandated by the district court would not have afforded significantly greater protection of appellees’ rights. Appellees had ample opportunity to express to HUD their views on the reasonableness of their leases: not only does HUD’s general procedure permit tenant comment at any time,16 but HUD expressly solicited public comment — which comprehended tenant participation — prior to issuing a rule concerning unreasonable lease provisions. See supra note 11. These opportunities for public comment during HUD’s rulemaking process more than satisfy the requirements of the due process clause.

Other Sections in This Document (55)

Full Text