Love v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 704 F.2d 100 (1983)

Citation: Love v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 704 F.2d 100 (1983)
Parent Document: Love v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development, 704 F.2d 100 (1983)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 1983-03-31
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8926891/love-v-united-states-department... ↗

Full Text

838 chars

On July 29, 1980, appellees filed suit in district court to enjoin enforcement of the judgments of possession. They alleged three grounds for relief. First, appellees contended that their landlords had violated the eviction procedures prescribed by HUD regulations. See 24 C.F.R. §§ 886.122, 450.-1-.7 (1982). Second, they alleged that the eviction procedures, as well as other terms, specified in their lease agreements were unreasonable.4 Finally, appellees argued that HUD had failed to comply with sections 202(b)(3) and 202(c) of the Housing and Community Development Amendments of 1978, 12 U.S.C. § 1715z-lb(b)(3), (c) (Supp. V 1981). Those sections require the Secretary of HUD to promulgate regulations prohibiting unreasonable lease provisions in rental agreements for HUD-subsidized housing: (b) The Secretary shall assure that—

Other Sections in This Document (55)

Full Text