§ 706

Citation: § 706
Parent Document: Aponte-Rosario v. Acevedo-Vilá, 617 F.3d 1 (2010)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 2010-07-28
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/151741/aponte-rosario-v-acevedo-vila/ ↗

Full Text

959 chars

PRPHA had expended funds to repair the elevators and to fix
problems with the water system. He also explained that in 2005,
security cameras were installed.
18
   Given that Appellants failed to shoulder the burden of showing
that a triable issue exists as to their de facto demolition claim,
we need not examine whether the district court abused its
discretion in admitting and considering the maintenance expense
reports of Las Gladiolas submitted by the Commonwealth defendants
which do not appear to have been properly authenticated as required
by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(e). See Carmona v. Toledo,
215 F.3d 124, 131 (1st Cir. 2000) ("To be admissible at the summary
judgment stage, documents must be authenticated by and attached to
an affidavit that meets the requirements of Rule 56(e)." (citations
and internal quotation marks omitted)). -24-
                         IV. Conclusions Because we find there are no genuine issues of material

Other Sections in This Document (366)

Full Text