Aponte-Rosario v. Acevedo-Vilá, 617 F.3d 1 (2010)

Citation: Aponte-Rosario v. Acevedo-Vilá, 617 F.3d 1 (2010)
Parent Document: Aponte-Rosario v. Acevedo-Vilá, 617 F.3d 1 (2010)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 2010-07-28
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/151741/aponte-rosario-v-acevedo-vila/ ↗

Full Text

646 chars

showing that Las Gladiolas Vive is a resident advisory board or
residents'    council    that    should    be   consulted    under
section 1437p(b)(2). Instead, they claim they are not required to
offer proof at this stage in the proceedings regarding the
organization's existence. Appellants' conclusory and unsupported
assertion is insufficient to overcome the Commonwealth defendants'
motion for summary judgment. Martínez-Rodríguez v. Guevara, 597
F.3d 414, 419 (1st Cir. 2010). Moreover, the record shows that the
PRPHA met with the established residents' council of Las Gladiolas
I and II prior to submitting the application for demolition.

Other Sections in This Document (366)

Full Text