Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Aponte-Rosario v. Acevedo-Vilá, 617 F.3d 1 (2010)

Citation
Aponte-Rosario v. Acevedo-Vilá, 617 F.3d 1 (2010)
Parent Document
Aponte-Rosario v. Acevedo-Vilá, 617 F.3d 1 (2010)
Effective Date
2010-07-28

Other Sections in This Document (366)

Full Text

1,001 chars
1
     Plaintiff-Appellants, Arcadio Aponte-Rosario, Mirta Colón-
Pellecier, and Iris Margarita Aponte-Marrero, (collectively,
Appellants), filed the present case as a class action suit. Class
certification was never granted as the district court dismissed all
of Appellants' claims.
2
    42 U.S.C. § 1437p(b)(2) provides:
     "The Secretary shall disapprove an application [for
     demolition or disposition] . . . if the Secretary
     determines that (1) any certification made by the public
     housing agency under that subsection is clearly
     inconsistent with information and data available to the
     Secretary or information or data requested by the
     Secretary; or (2) the application was not developed in
     consultation with-- (A) residents who will be affected by
     the proposed demolition or disposition; (B) each resident
     advisory board and resident council . . . that will be
     affected by the proposed demolition or disposition; . .
     . ." (emphasis added).