Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Aponte-Rosario v. Acevedo-Vilá, 617 F.3d 1 (2010)

Citation
Aponte-Rosario v. Acevedo-Vilá, 617 F.3d 1 (2010)
Parent Document
Aponte-Rosario v. Acevedo-Vilá, 617 F.3d 1 (2010)
Effective Date
2010-07-28

Other Sections in This Document (366)

Full Text

1,041 chars
12
   In his testimony at the 2002 annual hearing, Aponte explained
that a group of residents requested and was granted a meeting with
the Secretary of the Department of Housing of the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico, Ileana Echegoyen, to discuss demolition.
13
    The record shows that residents voiced their opposition to
demolition before a legislative committee and they also enlisted
the help of the School of Social Work of the University of Puerto
Rico in submitting alternative proposals to the PRPHA. The PRPHA
also established a support center that provided information and
counseling on demolition and relocation. However, the record does
not reveal whether the center was established prior to the filing
of the PRPHA's application for demolition.
14
   Appellants argue there is a genuine issue of material fact as
to whether the PRPHA consulted with the resident organization Las
Gladiolas Vive. Appellants, however, have not offered any evidence -15-
B. Due Process Claim Appellants also claim that their rights to constitutional