Section 8

Citation: Section 8
Parent Document: Feemster v. BSA LTD. PARTNERSHIP, 548 F.3d 1063 (2008)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 2008-11-14
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/187255/feemster-v-bsa-ltd-partnership/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (49)

Feemster v. BSA LTD. PARTNERSHIP, 548 F.3d 1063 (2008)
Feemster v. BSA LTD. PARTNERSHIP, 548 F.3d 1063 (2008)
Feemster v. BSA LTD. PARTNERSHIP, 548 F.3d 1063 (2008)
Feemster v. BSA LTD. PARTNERSHIP, 548 F.3d 1063 (2008)
Feemster v. BSA LTD. PARTNERSHIP, 548 F.3d 1063 (2008)
Feemster v. BSA LTD. PARTNERSHIP, 548 F.3d 1063 (2008)
Feemster v. BSA LTD. PARTNERSHIP, 548 F.3d 1063 (2008)
Feemster v. BSA LTD. PARTNERSHIP, 548 F.3d 1063 (2008)
Feemster v. BSA LTD. PARTNERSHIP, 548 F.3d 1063 (2008)
Feemster v. BSA LTD. PARTNERSHIP, 548 F.3d 1063 (2008)
Feemster v. BSA LTD. PARTNERSHIP, 548 F.3d 1063 (2008)
Feemster v. BSA LTD. PARTNERSHIP, 548 F.3d 1063 (2008)
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8
Section 8

Full Text

445 chars

For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that the tenants are
entitled to judgment as a matter of law on both their United
States Housing Act claim and their District of Columbia Human
Rights Act claim. The district court’s grant of summary
judgment in their favor on the former is affirmed. Its grant of
summary judgment against the tenants on the latter is reversed,
and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with
this opinion.